Database server

Comments: 16

• 24 Sep, '19
  Arleston

  Yes. Nice one!

• 19 Oct, '19
  WEMERSON C GUIMARAES

  I agree.. Postgres is amazing!

• 28 Oct, '19
  creativeshare

  I hope it will come true soon

• 28 Oct, '19
  lku

  The ability to run services like database/beanstalk/web server in standalone droplets connected together in some kind of a private network would be really a killer feature, even unique on the market. Adding new big features (mongodb, elasticsearch) would be much easier and we could have some horizontal scalability too! This suggestion is one of the best, but it is hidden behind the non-catchy title :)

• 22 Nov, '19
  Dalton

  In the meantime, Digital Ocean does have a managed, scalable database solution: https://www.digitalocean.com/products/managed-databases/

• 05 Dec, '19
  Chris

  Mysql / Mariadb are CPU hungry, so would make a substantial performance difference if we were able to separate our web app from our db, and be able to create a dedicated mariadb / postgres db server and for our web apps to migrate and use this with a few clicks.

• 04 Mar, '20
  WEMERSON C GUIMARAES

  Chris, i think split db in other server using runcloud is nonsense, because datacenters offers database signatures, even with more security and scaling options. Digital ocean offers mysql, postgres, redis in a scalable cluster; so it's redundant make this split.
  
  The good idea is in offer more than mariadb in server stack. So adding postgress in default instalation is a great idea... And when server grows just disable database service from runcloud dashboard and use an external source.

• 29 Apr, '20
  Karl

  If this does happen.
  Be good to have a Master-Slave option as well.

• 24 Jun, '20
  Karl

  me again.
  Just a heads up if you do make this work. Don't forget the 1-click install to WP, and Staging to hopefully work with a App-Server and DB-Server.
  I mean... If that can't work, more than happy to move everything to 1 server with more RAM.
  
  My main reason for RC is saving time, but if this is not in your plan this year or even next year, Might be forced to move everything to one server where everything works and enjoy the time-saving benefits.

• 13 Jul, '20
  Kevin Banks

  agreed if it was a cluyster format for redundancy

• 21 Aug, '20
  Wemerson

  There is another request for postgres here. See: https://features.runcloud.io/suggestions/56992/postgres

• 11 Oct, '20
  Pranav

  While this makes sense, it should also be noted that for some applications, localhost might just make sense as it will be faster and in some other cases it will be better to have an AWS RDS like solution.
  
  Please make it such that the use-case is clear.

• 10 Jun, '21
  abdul

  i need database replication without setting manual.

• 28 Aug, '21
  Imran

  Yes please make remote database server a thing

• 22 Sep, '21
  Pratik Asabe

  Yes, the ability to connect a database as an external database source in runcloud will be a very very must feature. I would like to share my experience with WordOps, I recently came from wordops setup because they do not maintain it on regular basis but what I did was set up two servers, one for web app and the other for database only and the performance was incredible, when a high traffic site runs on a normal server it gets above 2% load avg, but with separate DB server setup, my web app load avg was 0.05 to 0.8 and DB is almost chilling. So please consider the ability to create a server using runcloud and the ability to connect that as a database only server and the rest will operate the same within runcloud, if this happens runcloud will be unbeatable in the market for sure!!

• 10 Nov, '22
  Adam

  Another vote for this.